CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3360 vs 4770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Intel Core i7 4770

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3360

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 3.12 pt/$ vs 0.55 pt/$ Around 5.8x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per watt 10.41 pt/W vs 1.65 pt/W More than 6.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,029 vs 1,202 Around 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,523 vs 4,024 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 5 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 77.19W More than 10% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.01 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 10% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3360 vs Core i7 4770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3360
5,513
Core i7 4770
13,342

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3360
1,589
Core i7 4770
3,514

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3360
122,200 MB/s
Core i7 4770
4,500,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3360
5,028
Core i7 4770
13,074

GeekBench

Xeon X3360
5,157
Core i7 4770
14,063

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3360
4,024
Core i7 4770
9,523

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X3360
1,202
Core i7 4770
2,029

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3360  vs
Core i7 4770 
Clock speed 2.83 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 84W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 1.65 pt/W 10.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 68.25W

details

Xeon X3360  vs
Core i7 4770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.4°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.97 GHz 3.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz 4.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.97 GHz 3.85 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Xeon X3360
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus