CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3350 vs E5-1620 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-1620 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-1620  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 105.63W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 113.88 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 31.32 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-1620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-1620

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 9,487 vs 3,898 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,117 vs 1,159 Around 85% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per watt 7.47 pt/W vs 1.69 pt/W Around 4.5x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 3.3 pt/$ vs 0.6 pt/$ More than 5.5x better performance per dollar
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.95 GHz vs 3.83 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3350 vs E5-1620

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
5,746
Xeon E5-1620
12,397

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
1,654
Xeon E5-1620
3,066

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
131,400 MB/s
Xeon E5-1620
2,460,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
4,806
Xeon E5-1620
13,003

GeekBench

Xeon X3350
4,826
Xeon E5-1620
13,786

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3350
3,898
Xeon E5-1620
9,487

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X3350
1,159
Xeon E5-1620
2,117

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3350  vs
E5-1620 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 2011

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 130W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 113.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.69 pt/W 7.47 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 105.63W

details

Xeon X3350  vs
E5-1620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 38
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.6 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.4°C Unknown - 64°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 3.95 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz 4.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 3.95 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 1 0
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 0 MHz
Intel Xeon X3350
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus