CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3350 vs QX9770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3350

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 110.5W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 71.4 °C vs 55.5 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 32.76 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 119.14 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 QX9770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 QX9770

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz vs 3.83 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.47 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3350 vs Core2 QX9770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
5,746
Core2 QX9770
6,063

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
1,654
Core2 QX9770
1,736

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
131,400 MB/s
Core2 QX9770
137,050 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3350  vs
Core2 QX9770 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 136W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 32.76 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 119.14 $/year
Performance per watt 1.69 pt/W 1.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 110.5W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,600 MHz

details

Xeon X3350  vs
Core2 QX9770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 820,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 8
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.4°C Unknown - 55.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 4.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz 4.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 4.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon X3350
Report a correction
Intel Core2 QX9770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus