CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3350 vs 3570K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3570K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570K  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 107.5W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 38.81 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 71.4 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 106 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.09 pt/$ vs 0.6 pt/$ Around 5.2x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,012 vs 1,159 Around 75% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 7,152 vs 3,898 Around 85% better PassMark score
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly better performance per watt 4.69 pt/W vs 1.69 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.59 GHz vs 3.83 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.71 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3350 vs Core i5 3570K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
5,746
Core i5 3570K
10,311

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
131,400 MB/s
Core i5 3570K
2,650,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3350
4,806
Core i5 3570K
10,832

GeekBench

Xeon X3350
4,826
Core i5 3570K
15,009

x264 HD 4.0

Xeon X3350
51.94 fps
Core i5 3570K
100.16 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3350  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 77W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 106 $/year
Performance per watt 1.69 pt/W 4.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 107.5W

details

Xeon X3350  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 34
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.4°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 4.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz 4.71 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 4.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon X3350
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus