0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X3323 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
Released March, 2008
Intel Xeon X3323
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X3323
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 65W |
![]() | Newer Mar, 2008 | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon X3323CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 85.31W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Mar, 2008 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3323 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3323
4,644
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3323
1,391
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3323
107,200 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X3323
3,159
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X3323
1,061
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X3323 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.67 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 85.31W |
details | Xeon X3323 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.37 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.37 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Xeon X3323 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q8200 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
3570K vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||