CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3220 vs 3570 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3570 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570

Intel Core i5 3570

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3220

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 85.31W vs 107.5W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year vs 38.81 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year vs 106 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.04 pt/$ vs 0.63 pt/$ More than 4.8x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,989 vs 939 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better PassMark score 6,994 vs 3,107 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Jan, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly better performance per watt 4.22 pt/W vs 1.21 pt/W Around 3.5x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.02 GHz vs 3.52 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67 °C vs 62.2 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz vs 3.67 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3220 vs Core i5 3570

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3220
4,507
Core i5 3570
9,904

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3220
1,296
Core i5 3570
3,072

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3220
103,100 MB/s
Core i5 3570
2,580,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3220
4,365
Core i5 3570
9,892

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3220
4,757
Core i5 3570
10,445

GeekBench

Xeon X3220
4,757
Core i5 3570
13,173

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3220
3,107
Core i5 3570
6,994

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3220  vs
Core i5 3570 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 77W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 106 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 4.22 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 107.5W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Xeon X3220  vs
Core i5 3570 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 34
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 0.96 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62.2°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.52 GHz 4.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz 4.22 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,185.2 4,357.3
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz 4.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon X3220
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus