Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon W3670

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon W3670

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz More than 4x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 6 vs 1 5 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 1 11 more threads
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon A0800MPR24BA

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon A0800MPR24BA

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon A0800MPR24BA vs the Intel Xeon W3670.

Features Key features of the Xeon W3670  vs Athlon A0800MPR24BA 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon W3670  vs
Athlon A0800MPR24BA 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Hexa core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1366
Slot A

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Xeon W3670  vs
Athlon A0800MPR24BA 
Threads 12 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 105.63W N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,400 MHz 200 MHz
Intel Xeon W3670
Report a correction
AMD Athlon A0800MPR24BA
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus