0 Comments
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Atom S1269 |
Released March, 2009
Intel Xeon W3520
- 2.66 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon W3520
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.38 GHz |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released December, 2012
Intel Atom S1269
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom S1269
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 9.51W | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 10.25 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.38 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.46 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Supports more RAM | 24,576 MB | vs | 8,192 MB | Supports 3x more RAM | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 9.51W | vs | 105.63W | 11.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 10.25 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 11.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.82 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 11.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later |
Features Key features of the Xeon W3520 vs Atom S1269
clock speed
Xeon W3520
2.66 GHz
Atom S1269
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon W3520
1 MB
Atom S1269
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon W3520
4.38 GHz
Atom S1269
1.6 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon W3520
4.46 GHz
Atom S1269
1.6 GHz
TDP
Xeon W3520
130W
Atom S1269
11.7W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon W3520 | vs | Atom S1269 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 11.7W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 2.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 10.25 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 9.51W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon W3520 | vs | Atom S1269 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.38 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.46 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.38 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 24,576 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel Xeon W3520 ![]() | Intel Atom S1269 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 920 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$187 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2300 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2400 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||