Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon Phi 5120D

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon Phi 5120D

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 30 MB vs 1 MB 30x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More threads 240 vs 2 238 more threads
More cores 60 vs 2 58 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron T3100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron T3100

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 199.06W 7x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.05 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 59.02 $/year 7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 214.62 $/year 7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.05 GHz vs 1.05 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz vs 1.05 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon Phi 5120D  vs Celeron T3100 

clock speed

Xeon Phi 5120D
1.05 GHz
Celeron T3100
1.9 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon Phi 5120D
1.05 GHz
Celeron T3100
2.05 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon Phi 5120D
1.05 GHz
Celeron T3100
1.9 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon Phi 5120D  vs
Celeron T3100 
Clock speed 1.05 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores 60 cores Dual core
Socket type
PCI Express x24
479
P

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 245W 35W
Annual home energy cost 59.02 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 214.62 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 199.06W 28.44W

details

Xeon Phi 5120D  vs
Celeron T3100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 240 2
L2 cache 30 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.05 GHz 2.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.05 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.05 GHz 2.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon Phi 5120D
Report a correction
Intel Celeron T3100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus