Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon Phi 5110P

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon Phi 5110P

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 30 MB vs 1 MB 30x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More threads 240 vs 8 232 more threads
More cores 60 vs 4 56 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 1.05 GHz More than 3.8x higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much lower typical power consumption 73.94W vs 182.81W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.61 GHz vs 1.05 GHz Around 4.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual home energy cost 21.92 $/year vs 54.2 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 79.72 $/year vs 197.1 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.77 GHz vs 1.05 GHz More than 4.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2013 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Xeon Phi 5110P  vs Core i7 6700K 

clock speed

Xeon Phi 5110P
1.05 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon Phi 5110P
1.05 GHz
Core i7 6700K
4.61 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon Phi 5110P
1.05 GHz
Core i7 6700K
4.77 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon Phi 5110P  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Clock speed 1.05 GHz 4 GHz
Cores 60 cores Quad core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 225W 91W
Annual home energy cost 54.2 $/year 21.92 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 197.1 $/year 79.72 $/year
Typical power consumption 182.81W 73.94W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 0

details

Xeon Phi 5110P  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 240 8
L2 cache 30 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.05 GHz 4.61 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.05 GHz 4.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.05 GHz 4.61 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
GDDR5
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Xeon Phi 5110P
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 6700K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus