Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon LC3528

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon LC3528

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 48.75W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 52.56 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 14.45 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Feb, 2010 vs Mar, 2009 Release date 10 months later
Front view of Intel Xeon L5518

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5518

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% higher turbo clock speed
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.71 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C vs 79.5 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.13 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon LC3528  vs L5518 

clock speed

Xeon LC3528
1.73 GHz
Xeon L5518
2.13 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon LC3528
1.87 GHz
Xeon L5518
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon LC3528
1.73 GHz
Xeon L5518
3.71 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon LC3528
1.73 GHz
Xeon L5518
2.13 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon LC3528  vs
L5518 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 2.13 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.87 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1366

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 60W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 14.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 52.56 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 48.75W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Triple Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes

details

Xeon LC3528  vs
L5518 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 0.75 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 79.5°C Unknown - 85°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.73 GHz 3.71 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.73 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.73 GHz 3.71 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture DMI QPI
Number of links 1 2
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,860 MT/s
Intel Xeon LC3528
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L5518
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus