Winner
Intel Xeon L7455
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L7455 based on its cost to run.
See full details Intel Xeon L7455 vs E7450 |
Released September, 2008
Intel Xeon L7455
- 2.13 GHz
- Hexa core
4.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L7455
 | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
VS
Released September, 2008
Intel Xeon E7450
- 2.4 GHz
- Hexa core
4.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E7450
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L7455 vs E7450 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 9 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 73.13W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 78.84 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.68 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.59 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L7455 vs E7450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L7455 | vs | E7450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 604 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Xeon L7455 | vs | E7450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 6 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 9 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 1,900,000,000 | 1,900,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 32 | 32 | |
| Clock multiplier | 8 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 0.9 - 1.45V | 0.9 - 1.45V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73°C | Unknown - 68°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 90W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.68 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 78.84 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.87 pt/W | 2.33 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 73.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon L7455  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E7450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $2,391 | $969 | |
| E7450 vs E5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,391 | $264 | |
| E7450 vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,391 | $2,059 | |
| E7450 vs E7440 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,391 | $390 | |
| E7450 vs 5820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,391 | ||
| E7450 vs E6405 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,391 | $305 | |
| E7450 vs 2600 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,729 | $1,100 | |
| L7455 vs 3970X | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
