Winner
Intel Xeon L7455
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L7455 based on its cost to run.
See full details | Intel Xeon L7455 vs E7450 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
4.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 9 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 73.13W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 78.84 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.68 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.59 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | Xeon L7455 | vs | E7450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
details | Xeon L7455 | vs | E7450 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 6 | 6 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 9 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 1,900,000,000 | 1,900,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 32 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.9 - 1.45V | 0.9 - 1.45V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73°C | Unknown - 68°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 90W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.68 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 78.84 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.87 pt/W | 2.33 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 73.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Xeon L7455 ![]() | Intel Xeon E7450 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $777 | |
E7450 vs E5540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $2,059 | |
E7450 vs E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $264 | |
E7450 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $969 | |
E7450 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $520 | |
E7450 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $125 | |
E7450 vs E7400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $2,837 | |
E7450 vs X7460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||