Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L7345

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L7345

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 vs 1 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 40.63W vs 44.69W Around 10% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year vs 48.18 $/year Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year vs 13.25 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Sep, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.68 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon L7345  vs Celeron G1610 

clock speed

Xeon L7345
1.86 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon L7345
1.87 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon L7345
1.87 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.68 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L7345  vs
Celeron G1610 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
604
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 50W 55W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 40.63W 44.69W

details

Xeon L7345  vs
Celeron G1610 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 32 1
Clock multiplier 7 26

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.87 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz 2.68 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L7345
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus