Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2630
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2630 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon L5630 vs E5-2630 |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.66 GHz | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 32.5W |
![]() | More l3 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.48 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 8,634 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,634 | ![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | vs | 2.55 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 77.19W | 2.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
More l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 20% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | vs | 2.74 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better PassMark score | 8,634 | vs | 4,420 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,634 | vs | 943 | Around 75% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 12 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per watt | 8.05 pt/W | vs | 1.92 pt/W | Around 4.2x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.26 pt/$ | vs | 0.14 pt/$ | More than 9x better performance per dollar | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 294,912 MB | Supports around 35% more RAM | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later |
summary | Xeon L5630 | vs | E5-2630 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.92 pt/W | 8.05 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 77.19W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 42,666.64 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 393,216 MB |
details | Xeon L5630 | vs | E5-2630 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 16 | 28 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.1°C | Unknown - 77.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 1 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.66 GHz | 2.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 2.74 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | 2.55 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 46,928 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 5,860 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 2,930 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
Intel Xeon L5630 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$605 | $610 | |
E5-2630 vs 2630 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$605 | $410 | |
E5-2630 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$605 | $520 | |
E5-2630 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$605 | $662 | |
E5-2630 vs E5-2630L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$554 | $554 | |
L5630 vs L5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$554 | $999 | |
L5630 vs L5640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$554 | $279 | |
L5630 vs E5620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||