0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5609 vs E5620 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon L5609
- 1.86 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5609
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 32.5W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year |
VS
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon E5620
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E5620
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 2.66 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 7.59 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.18 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 65W | 2x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 7.59 pt/W | vs | 3.43 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.18 pt/$ | vs | 0.31 pt/$ | Around 7x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.75 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5609 vs E5620
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5609
7,865
Xeon E5620
14,086
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5609
2,423
Xeon E5620
1,898
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5609
1,510 MB/s
Xeon E5620
1,280,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5609 | vs | E5620 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.43 pt/W | 7.59 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 65W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 25,599.99 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 294,912 MB |
details | Xeon L5609 | vs | E5620 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 18 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.75 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.1°C | Unknown - 77.6°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | 4.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.83 GHz | 3.75 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 38,400 MB/s | 46,928 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 4,800 MT/s | 5,860 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 2,400 MHz | 2,930 MHz |
Intel Xeon L5609 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5620 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $264 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs Core i7 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $520 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $410 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $999 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs L5640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $565 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs E5645 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $391 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $1,443 | |
Intel Xeon E5620 vs X5670 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||