0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5520 vs E5520 |
Released March, 2009
Intel Xeon L5520
- 2.26 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5520
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 48.75W | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.42 GHz |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 52.56 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 14.45 $/year |
VS
Released March, 2009
Intel Xeon E5520
- 2.26 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E5520
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.27 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5520 vs E5520 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 48.75W | vs | 65W | 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.42 GHz | vs | 3.28 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.27 GHz | vs | 4.08 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5520 vs E5520
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5520
6,798
Xeon E5520
12,384
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5520
1,624
Xeon E5520
1,701
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5520
108,400 MB/s
Xeon E5520
102,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5520
6,516
Xeon E5520
7,188
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5520
7,962
Xeon E5520
6,848
GeekBench
Xeon L5520
7,962
Xeon E5520
8,874
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon L5520
4,387
Xeon E5520
4,453
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon L5520
1,034
Xeon E5520
1,024
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5520 | vs | E5520 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 60W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.66 pt/W | 2.4 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 48.75W | 65W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 25,599.99 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 147,456 MB | 147,456 MB |
details | Xeon L5520 | vs | E5520 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 731,000,000 | 731,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 17 | 17 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.75 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.42 GHz | 3.28 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.08 GHz | 4.27 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.42 GHz | 3.28 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 46,928 MB/s | 46,928 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 5,860 MT/s | 5,860 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 2,930 MHz | 2,930 MHz |
Intel Xeon L5520 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5520 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $391 | |
E5620 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $391 | |
E3-1270 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $391 | |
3770K vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $391 | |
X5650 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $391 | |
920 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $391 | |
3770 vs E5520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $554 | |
3770K vs L5520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Vitalka (10:51 AM, November 1, 2013)