0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5420 vs L5335 |
Released March, 2008
Intel Xeon L5420
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5420
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released August, 2007
Intel Xeon L5335
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the L5335
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5420 vs L5335 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 8 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Mar, 2008 | vs | Aug, 2007 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5420 vs L5335
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5420
4,968
Xeon L5335
7,112
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5420
1,380
Xeon L5335
1,088
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5420
107,200 MB/s
Xeon L5335
81,900 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon L5420
3,506
Xeon L5335
2,756
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon L5420
1,043
Xeon L5335
800
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5420 | vs | L5335 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 50W | 50W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | 12.04 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | 43.8 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 2.52 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 40.63W | 40.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon L5420 | vs | L5335 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 6 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1.1 - 1.25V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 57°C | Unknown - 60°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.67 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.85 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | 2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon L5420 ![]() | Intel Xeon L5335 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$324 | $413 | |
E5335 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $413 | |
E5450 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$347 | $413 | |
E5420 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | ||
Q6600 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $413 | |
Q9550 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $413 | |
E8400 vs L5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $413 | |
Q8400 vs L5420 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||