0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5420 vs L5318 |
Released March, 2008
Intel Xeon L5420
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5420
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Xeon L5318
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the L5318
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 32.5W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 8 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Mar, 2008 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 40.63W | 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 43.8 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 12.04 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon L5420 vs L5318
clock speed
Xeon L5420
2.5 GHz
Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon L5420
12 MB
Xeon L5318
8 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon L5420
3.67 GHz
Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon L5420
3.85 GHz
Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz
TDP
Xeon L5420
50W
Xeon L5318
40W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5420 | vs | L5318 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 50W | 40W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | 9.64 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | 35.04 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 40.63W | 32.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Xeon L5420 | vs | L5318 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.9 - 1.25V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 57°C | Unknown - 72.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.67 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.85 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon L5420 ![]() | Intel Xeon L5318 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $324 | |
L5420 vs E5335 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $347 | |
L5420 vs E5420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $969 | |
L5420 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | ||
L5420 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $179 | |
L5420 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $179 | |
L5420 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$413 | $287 | |
L5420 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||