0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5410 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
Released March, 2008
Intel Xeon L5410
- 2.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5410
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 102,800 MB/s | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,490 |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 62.2 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon L5410CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 8 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 40.63W | vs | 85.31W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Mar, 2008 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 102,800 MB/s | vs | 76.7 MB/s | More than 1340.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,490 | vs | 1,444 | More than 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | vs | 2.96 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 62.2 °C | vs | 57 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5410 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5410
1,444
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5410
962
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5410
76.7 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon L5410
3,349
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon L5410
1,022
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5410 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 50W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.46 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 40.63W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Xeon L5410 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 57°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.96 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.58 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.96 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon L5410 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Q6600 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||