Intel Xeon L5410 vs Core2 Quad Q6600

older Released March, 2008

Intel Xeon L5410

2.33 GHz
Quad core

Front view of Intel Xeon L5410

5.1 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5410

	Much more l2 cache 12 MB		Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm
	Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W		Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core

VS

older Released January, 2007

Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

2.4 GHz
Quad core

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

5.1 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600

	Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 102,800 MB/s		Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,490
	Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz		Higher Maximum operating temperature 62.2 °C

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon L5410 5.3 Core2 Quad Q6600 5.3 Core i3 3220 3.6
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon L5410 5.7 Core2 Quad Q6600 5.8 Core i3 3220 6.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon L5410 0.0 Core2 Quad Q6600 0.0 Core i3 3220 1.5
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon L5410 0.0 Core2 Quad Q6600 0.0 Core i3 3220 4.9
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon L5410 5.1 Core2 Quad Q6600 5.0 Core i3 3220 5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon L5410 n.d. Core2 Quad Q6600 n.d. Core i3 3220 6.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Xeon L5410

CPUBoss Winner

Front view of Intel Xeon L5410

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Xeon L5410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5410

Report a correction

Much more l2 cache

12 MB

vs

8 MB

50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later

Much newer manufacturing process

45 nm

vs

65 nm

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Much lower typical power consumption

40.63W

vs

85.31W

2.1x lower typical power consumption

Much more l2 cache per core

3 MB/core

vs

2 MB/core

50% more l2 cache per core

Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration

2

vs

1

Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Much lower annual home energy cost

12.04 $/year

vs

25.29 $/year

2.1x lower annual home energy cost

Much lower annual commercial energy cost

43.8 $/year

vs

91.98 $/year

2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Newer

Mar, 2008

vs

Jan, 2007

Release date over 1 years later

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Report a correction

Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score

102,800 MB/s

vs

76.7 MB/s

More than 1340.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score

Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

4,490

vs

1,444

More than 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Better overclocked clock speed (Air)

3.52 GHz

vs

2.96 GHz

Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Higher Maximum operating temperature

62.2 °C

vs

57 °C

Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,444

Core2 Quad Q6600

4,490

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

962

Core2 Quad Q6600

1,306

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

76.7 MB/s

Core2 Quad Q6600

102,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

3,349

Core2 Quad Q6600

2,970

PassMark (Single Core)

1,022

Core2 Quad Q6600

924

summary	Xeon L5410	vs	Core2 Quad Q6600
Clock speed	2.33 GHz		2.4 GHz
Cores	Quad core		Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	50W		105W
Annual home energy cost	12.04 $/year		25.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	43.8 $/year		91.98 $/year
Performance per watt	1.46 pt/W		1.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption	40.63W		85.31W
bus
Architecture	FSB		FSB
Number of links	1		1
Clock speed	1,333 MHz		1,066 MHz

details	Xeon L5410	vs	Core2 Quad Q6600
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	4		4
L2 cache	12 MB		8 MB
L2 cache per core	3 MB/core		2 MB/core
Manufacture process	45 nm		65 nm
Transistor count	820,000,000		582,000,000
Max CPUs	2		1
Clock multiplier	7		9
Voltage range	0.85 - 1.35V		0.85 - 1.5V
Operating temperature	Unknown - 57°C		Unknown - 62.2°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.96 GHz		3.52 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	3.58 GHz		3.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.96 GHz		3.52 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A

Intel Xeon L5410

Report a correction

Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Report a correction

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

L5410 vs 2100

VS

Q6600 vs 3220

Comments

comments powered by Disqus