CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5410 vs 3770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5410

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 40.63W vs 62.56W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year vs 18.55 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year vs 67.45 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 2.33 pt/$ vs 0.21 pt/$ Around 11.2x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,072 vs 1,022 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,449 vs 3,349 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Much better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W vs 1.46 pt/W Around 5x better performance per watt
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.96 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Mar, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.4 °C vs 57 °C Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 3.58 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5410 vs Core i7 3770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5410
1,444
Core i7 3770
12,524

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5410
76.7 MB/s
Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L5410
3,349
Core i7 3770
9,449

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon L5410
1,022
Core i7 3770
2,072

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5410  vs
Core i7 3770 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 50W 77W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 67.45 $/year
Performance per watt 1.46 pt/W 7.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 40.63W 62.56W

details

Xeon L5410  vs
Core i7 3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 1,300,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 34
Operating temperature Unknown - 57°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.96 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.96 GHz 4.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L5410
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus