Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Intel Core i5 2400

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5410

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W vs 93.6W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year vs 27.75 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year vs 100.92 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2400

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 4.58 pt/$ vs 0.21 pt/$ More than 22x better performance per dollar
Significantly higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 8.14 pt/W vs 1.46 pt/W More than 5.5x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,742 vs 1,022 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 57 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark score 5,901 vs 3,349 More than 75% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.54 GHz vs 2.96 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Mar, 2008 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5410 vs Core i5 2400

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5410
1,444
Core i5 2400
8,298

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5410
76.7 MB/s
Core i5 2400
2,260,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L5410
3,349
Core i5 2400
5,901

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon L5410
1,022
Core i5 2400
1,742

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5410  vs
Core i5 2400 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 50W 95W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 27.75 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 100.92 $/year
Performance per watt 1.46 pt/W 8.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 40.63W 93.6W

details

Xeon L5410  vs
Core i5 2400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 31
Operating temperature Unknown - 57°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.96 GHz 3.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz 3.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.96 GHz 3.54 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L5410
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus