0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5408 vs E3110 |
Released February, 2008
Intel Xeon L5408
- 2.13 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5408
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 32.5W | ![]() | More threads 4 |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Xeon E3110
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3110
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon L5408CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 52.81W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.12 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 3.34 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5408 vs E3110
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
6,095
Xeon E3110
3,081
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
1,324
Xeon E3110
1,697
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
105,400 MB/s
Xeon E3110
123,300 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon L5408
2,987
Xeon E3110
2,169
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon L5408
932
Xeon E3110
1,267
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5408 | vs | E3110 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.41 pt/W | 2.01 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon L5408 | vs | E3110 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.34 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.12 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.34 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon L5408 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3110 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Xeon E3110 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $179 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Xeon E3110 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon E3110 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Xeon E3110 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Xeon E3110 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$494 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon L5408 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $494 | |
Intel Xeon E5450 vs L5408 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||