Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon L5408

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon L5408

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5408

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5408

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 6 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 52.81W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.12 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3110

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz vs 3.34 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5408 vs E3110

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5408
6,095
Xeon E3110
3,081

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5408
1,324
Xeon E3110
1,697

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5408
105,400 MB/s
Xeon E3110
123,300 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L5408
2,987
Xeon E3110
2,169

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5408  vs
E3110 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 40W 65W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 3.41 pt/W 2.01 pt/W
Typical power consumption 32.5W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon L5408  vs
E3110 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 12 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 8 9
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 72.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.34 GHz 4.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.12 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.34 GHz 4.25 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L5408
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus