0 Comments
| Intel Xeon L5408 vs Pentium E5300 |
Released February, 2008
Intel Xeon L5408
- 2.13 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5408
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 6,095 | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Pentium E5300
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Pentium E5300
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 110,800 MB/s | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.5 pt/$ | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Pentium E5300CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 2 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 6,095 | vs | 2,510 | Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 52.81W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.41 pt/W | vs | 1.66 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 110,800 MB/s | vs | 105,400 MB/s | More than 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.5 pt/$ | vs | 0.28 pt/$ | Around 5.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.34 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 4.12 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5408 vs Pentium E5300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
6,095
Pentium E5300
2,510
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
1,324
Pentium E5300
1,358
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon L5408
105,400 MB/s
Pentium E5300
110,800 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon L5408
2,987
Pentium E5300
1,549
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon L5408
932
Pentium E5300
1,052
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5408 | vs | Pentium E5300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.41 pt/W | 1.66 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Xeon L5408 | vs | Pentium E5300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 13 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.34 GHz | 3.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.12 GHz | 4.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.34 GHz | 3.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon L5408 ![]() | Intel Pentium E5300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $117 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $179 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $64 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Pentium E5300 vs AMD Athlon X2 4000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||