CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5335 vs 5150 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon L5335

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon L5335

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5335

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 40.63W vs 52.81W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Aug, 2007 vs Jun, 2006 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon 5150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5150

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.14 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.75 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5335 vs 5150

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5335
7,112
Xeon 5150
4,970

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5335
1,088
Xeon 5150
1,413

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5335
81,900 MB/s
Xeon 5150
106,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L5335
2,756
Xeon 5150
1,741

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 5150
1,020

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5335  vs
5150 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.66 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 50W 65W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.52 pt/W 1.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 40.63W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon L5335  vs
5150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 6 8
Voltage range 1.1 - 1.25V 1 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 3.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 3.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 3.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L5335
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 5150
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus