Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon L5335 vs Core i7 3770K |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.21 pt/$ |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 40.63W | vs | 114.97W | 2.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | vs | 42.19 $/year | 3.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | vs | 112.39 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 75% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.21 pt/$ | vs | 0.33 pt/$ | More than 6.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,084 | vs | 800 | More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 9,544 | vs | 2,756 | Around 3.5x better PassMark score | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2007 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.55 pt/W | vs | 2.52 pt/W | More than 80% better performance per watt | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.4 °C | vs | 60 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature |
summary | Xeon L5335 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 50W | 77W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | 42.19 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | 112.39 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.52 pt/W | 4.55 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 40.63W | 114.97W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon L5335 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 6 | 35 | |
Voltage range | 1.1 - 1.25V | 1.33 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 |
Intel Xeon L5335 ![]() | Intel Core i7 3770K ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $128 | |
3770K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $240 | |
3770K vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $248 | |
3770K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $184 | |
3770K vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $350 | |
3770K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $330 | |
3770K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $520 | |
3770K vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||