CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5335 vs 3320M among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3320M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3320M  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3320M

Intel Core i5 3320M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5335

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 7,112 vs 5,486 Around 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Core i5 3320M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3320M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 1.88 pt/$ vs 0.33 pt/$ More than 5.8x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 12.64 pt/W vs 2.52 pt/W More than 5x better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 60 °C 75% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,636 vs 800 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.08 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 40.63W 30% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 12.04 $/year 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 43.8 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5335 vs Core i5 3320M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon L5335
81,900 MB/s
Core i5 3320M
2,140,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5335  vs
Core i5 3320M 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 50W 35W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.52 pt/W 12.64 pt/W
Typical power consumption 40.63W 28.44W

details

Xeon L5335  vs
Core i5 3320M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 6 26
Operating temperature Unknown - 60°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 3.08 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 3.08 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L5335
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3320M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus