Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5318

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5318

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 43.88W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 13.01 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 47.3 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Pentium G3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.05 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Sep, 2013 vs Jan, 2007 Release date over 6 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon L5318  vs Pentium G3220 

clock speed

Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz
Pentium G3220
3.05 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon L5318
1.6 GHz
Pentium G3220
3.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5318  vs
Pentium G3220 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 40W 54W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 47.3 $/year
Typical power consumption 32.5W 43.88W

details

Xeon L5318  vs
Pentium G3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.2°C Unknown - 72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 3.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Xeon L5318
Report a correction
Intel Pentium G3220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus