Intel Xeon L5310 vs Core2 QX6700 |
Released March, 2007
Intel Xeon L5310
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon L5310
 | Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year |
VS
Released November, 2006
Intel Core2 QX6700
- 2.66 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core2 QX6700
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.3 GHz | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 64.5 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 40.63W | vs | 105.63W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Mar, 2007 | vs | Nov, 2006 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 64.5 °C | vs | 60 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon L5310 vs Core2 QX6700
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon L5310 | vs | Core2 QX6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 50W | 130W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 12.04 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 43.8 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 40.63W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Xeon L5310 | vs | Core2 QX6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 6 | 10 | |
| Voltage range | 1.1 - 1.25V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 64.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.3 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Xeon L5310  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 QX6700 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| QX6700 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $268 | ||
| QX6700 vs Q6700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $287 | ||
| QX6700 vs Q9550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| QX6700 vs Q9400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| QX6700 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| QX6700 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| QX6700 vs Q9300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
