CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L5238 vs L3110 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon L3110 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L3110  based on its performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon L3110

Intel Xeon L3110

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5238

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5238

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 36.56W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon L3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3110

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Feb, 2009 vs Feb, 2008 Release date a year later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L5238 vs L3110

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L5238
1,823
Xeon L3110
2,273

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5238  vs
L3110 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 45W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 2.13 pt/W 2.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 36.56W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon L5238  vs
L3110 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 8 9
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71°C Unknown - 78.65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.67 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.67 GHz 3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L5238
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L3110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus