Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L5215

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5215

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 0.5 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Slightly higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.7 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i7 4650U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4650U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.12 GHz vs 1.87 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 5 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 16.25W 25% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 4.82 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 17.52 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon L5215  vs Core i7 4650U 

clock speed

Xeon L5215
1.86 GHz
Core i7 4650U
1.7 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon L5215
1.87 GHz
Core i7 4650U
3.12 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon L5215
1.87 GHz
Core i7 4650U
1.7 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L5215  vs
Core i7 4650U 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 20W 15W
Annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 16.25W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 66 MHz

details

Xeon L5215  vs
Core i7 4650U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 24
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 0.65 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 75°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.87 GHz 3.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz 3.12 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 5000
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 200 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz
Intel Xeon L5215
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4650U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus