Winner
Intel Xeon L3426
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L3426 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Xeon L3426 vs Atom C2750 |
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.08 GHz |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | More cores 8 |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 11.79 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.38 pt/$ |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
4.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Xeon L3426CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.08 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per watt | 11.79 pt/W | vs | 2.5 pt/W | Around 4.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.38 pt/$ | vs | 0.37 pt/$ | Around 3.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 97 °C | vs | 58.3 °C | More than 65% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 36.56W | 2.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon L3426 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.5 pt/W | 11.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon L3426 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 58.3°C | Unknown - 97°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.08 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.08 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Xeon L3426 ![]() | Intel Atom C2750 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $171 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 vs Atom C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $171 | |
Intel Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $171 | |
Intel Atom C2758 vs C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $171 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$210 | $171 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $171 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Atom C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$210 | $305 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1220 vs L3426 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||