CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L3360 vs L3110 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L3360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3360

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 6 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Xeon L3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3110

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 52.81W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L3360 vs L3110

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon L3360
3,820
Xeon L3110
2,273

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon L3360
1,221
Xeon L3110
1,266

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L3360  vs
L3110 
Clock speed 2.83 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 45W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 2.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 36.56W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon L3360  vs
L3110 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 12 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 9
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 76.25°C Unknown - 78.65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.83 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.83 GHz 3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L3360
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L3110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus