CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L3360 vs QX9770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L3360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3360

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 110.5W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 76.25 °C vs 55.5 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 32.76 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 119.14 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 2.25 pt/W vs 1.32 pt/W More than 70% better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2009 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core2 QX9770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 QX9770

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.83 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz vs 2.83 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.47 GHz vs 2.83 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon L3360  vs Core2 QX9770 

clock speed

Xeon L3360
2.83 GHz
Core2 QX9770
3.2 GHz

L2 cache

Xeon L3360
12 MB
Core2 QX9770
12 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon L3360
2.83 GHz
Core2 QX9770
4.23 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon L3360
2.83 GHz
Core2 QX9770
4.47 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L3360  vs
Core2 QX9770 
Clock speed 2.83 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 136W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 32.76 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 119.14 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 1.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 110.5W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,600 MHz

details

Xeon L3360  vs
Core2 QX9770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 820,000,000 820,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 8
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 76.25°C Unknown - 55.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.83 GHz 4.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz 4.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.83 GHz 4.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L3360
Report a correction
Intel Core2 QX9770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus