CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L3110 vs G2010 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium G2010 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G2010  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Pentium G2010

Intel Pentium G2010

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3110

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 44.69W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 48.18 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 13.25 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Pentium G2010

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G2010

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ vs 0.48 pt/$ Around 4.8x better performance per dollar
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Feb, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,499 vs 1,266 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L3110 vs Pentium G2010

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L3110  vs
Pentium G2010 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 55W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 2.61 pt/W 2.6 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 44.69W

details

Xeon L3110  vs
Pentium G2010 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 28

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3 GHz 2.84 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz 2.84 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L3110
Report a correction
Intel Pentium G2010
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus