Winner
Intel Pentium G2010
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G2010 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon L3110 vs Pentium G2010 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 36.56W |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ | ![]() | Newer Jan, 2013 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Pentium G2010CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 44.69W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.24 pt/$ | vs | 0.48 pt/$ | Around 4.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Feb, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,499 | vs | 1,266 | Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score |
summary | Xeon L3110 | vs | Pentium G2010 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.61 pt/W | 2.6 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 44.69W |
details | Xeon L3110 | vs | Pentium G2010 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 28 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Xeon L3110 ![]() | Intel Pentium G2010 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $64 | |
3210 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $64 | |
G2020 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $64 | |
E8400 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $64 | |
2100 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
3220 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
Q6600 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $64 | |
G2030 vs G2010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||