CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L3110 vs E8600 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo E8600 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo E8600  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3110

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 120.65W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 47.3 $/year 4.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 113.62 $/year 2.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 2.61 pt/W vs 1.1 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Higher Maximum operating temperature 78.65 °C vs 72.4 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Feb, 2009 vs Jul, 2008 Release date 7 months later
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E8600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E8600

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.33 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.61 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.6 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon L3110 vs Core2 Duo E8600

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L3110  vs
Core2 Duo E8600 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.33 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 65W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 47.3 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 113.62 $/year
Performance per watt 2.61 pt/W 1.1 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 120.65W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon L3110  vs
Core2 Duo E8600 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 10
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 78.65°C Unknown - 72.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3 GHz 4.61 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 4.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz 4.61 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon L3110
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo E8600
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus