Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon L3014

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3014

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 0.25 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly lower typical power consumption 24.38W vs 28.44W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 7.23 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 26.28 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G470

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 5 years later

Features Key features of the Xeon L3014  vs Celeron G470 

clock speed

Xeon L3014
2.4 GHz
Celeron G470
2 GHz

L2 cache

Xeon L3014
3 MB
Celeron G470
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon L3014
3.37 GHz
Celeron G470
2.1 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon L3014
2.4 GHz
Celeron G470
2.13 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon L3014  vs
Celeron G470 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 30W 35W
Annual home energy cost 7.23 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 26.28 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 24.38W 28.44W

details

Xeon L3014  vs
Celeron G470 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 3 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.37 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.13 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,142.9 1,697.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon L3014
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G470
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus