Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon EC5509

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon EC5509

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 69.06W 5.7x lower typical power consumption
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 20.48 $/year 5.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 74.46 $/year 5.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon EC5509  vs Core i5 5200U 

clock speed

Xeon EC5509
2 GHz
Core i5 5200U
2.2 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon EC5509  vs
Core i5 5200U 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 85W 15W
Annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 69.06W 12.19W

details

Xeon EC5509  vs
Core i5 5200U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 5500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 900 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Triple Channel Dual Channel

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon EC5509
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 5200U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus