0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7540 vs E7-4807 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon E7540
- 2 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7540
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 |
VS
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E7-4807
- 1.86 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the E7-4807
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
![]() | Newer Apr, 2011 | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 85.31W | Around 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Apr, 2011 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date a year later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 10% lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7540 vs E7-4807
clock speed
Xeon E7540
2 GHz
Xeon E7-4807
1.86 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E7540
2 MB
Xeon E7-4807
2 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E7540
18 MB
Xeon E7-4807
18 MB
TDP
Xeon E7540
105W
Xeon E7-4807
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7540 | vs | E7-4807 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1567 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 77.19W |
details | Xeon E7540 | vs | E7-4807 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 18 MB | 18 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 8 | 4 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 4 | 1 | |
Data rate | 102,400 MB/s | 19,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 2,400 MHz |
Intel Xeon E7540 ![]() | Intel Xeon E7-4807 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,650 | $2,059 | |
E5-2670 v3 vs E7540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $2,059 | |
4770K vs E7540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $2,059 | |
X5650 vs E7540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,059 | $2,059 | |
X7542 vs E7540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $890 | |
4770K vs E7-4807 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,446 | $890 | |
E7530 vs E7-4807 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | $890 | |
E5-2620 vs E7-4807 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||