Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E7450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E7450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 9 MB vs 4 MB 2.2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 vs 8 24 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 73.13W vs 138.13W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 78.84 $/year vs 148.92 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 21.68 $/year vs 40.95 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Itanium 9540

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9540

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 12 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 16 vs 6 10 more threads
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 4 years later

Features Key features of the Xeon E7450  vs Itanium 9540 

clock speed

Xeon E7450
2.4 GHz
Itanium 9540
2.13 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Xeon E7450
12 MB
Itanium 9540
24 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E7450  vs
Itanium 9540 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
604
LGA 1248

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 90W 170W
Annual home energy cost 21.68 $/year 40.95 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 78.84 $/year 148.92 $/year
Typical power consumption 73.13W 138.13W

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 3,200 MHz

details

Xeon E7450  vs
Itanium 9540 
Threads 6 16
L2 cache 9 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 24 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 32 8

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E7450
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9540
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus