0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7440 vs E7340 |
Released September, 2008
Intel Xeon E7440
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7440
![]() | Much more l2 cache 16 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Newer Sep, 2008 |
VS
Released September, 2007
Intel Xeon E7340
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E7340
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 65W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E7440 vs E7340 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 16 MB | vs | 8 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Sep, 2008 | vs | Sep, 2007 | Release date over a year later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 73.13W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 78.84 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 21.68 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E7440 vs E7340
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7440
14,135
Xeon E7340
14,972
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7440
1,170
Xeon E7340
1,259
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7440
102,600 MB/s
Xeon E7340
143.6 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7440 | vs | E7340 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 90W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.68 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 78.84 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.51 pt/W | 2.24 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 73.13W | 65W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Xeon E7440 | vs | E7340 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 1,900,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 32 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.9 - 1.45V | 1 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 68°C | Unknown - 66°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E7440 ![]() | Intel Xeon E7340 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,391 | $2,059 | |
Intel Xeon E7450 vs E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $2,059 | |
Intel Xeon E5450 vs E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$330 | $2,059 | |
Intel Core i7 2600K vs Xeon E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$735 | $2,059 | |
Intel Xeon E5440 vs E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $2,059 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs E7440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $2,059 | |
Intel Core i5 3570K vs Xeon E7340 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$220 | $2,059 | |
Intel Core i5 2500K vs Xeon E7340 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||