Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E7430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E7430

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 vs 1 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Significantly more l3 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 10,058 vs 1,672 More than 6x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l3 cache per core
Higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.13 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.13 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A4 4355M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 4355M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 73.13W 5.3x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 68 °C More than 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better geekbench 3 AES single core score 1,460 MB/s vs 90.3 MB/s Around 16.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 21.68 $/year 5.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 78.84 $/year 5.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.03 pt/W vs 1.39 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E7430 vs A4 4355M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E7430
10,058
A4 4355M
1,672

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E7430
1,041
A4 4355M
1,115

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E7430
90.3 MB/s
A4 4355M
1,460 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E7430  vs
A4 4355M 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7400G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 327 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 424 MHz

details

Xeon E7430  vs
A4 4355M 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,900,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 32 1
Clock multiplier 8 19
Operating temperature Unknown - 68°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.13 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.13 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.13 GHz 1.9 GHz

power consumption

TDP 90W 17W
Annual home energy cost 21.68 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 78.84 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 1.39 pt/W 3.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 73.13W 13.81W
Intel Xeon E7430
Report a correction
AMD A4 4355M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus