Winner
Intel Core i7 4770
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E7320 vs Core i7 4770 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.12 pt/$ | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 60% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.12 pt/$ | vs | 0.07 pt/$ | More than 41.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,029 | vs | 751 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.41 pt/W | vs | 1.14 pt/W | More than 9x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 9,523 | vs | 2,413 | Around 4x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2007 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.01 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 66 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature |
summary | Xeon E7320 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.14 pt/W | 10.41 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 68.25W |
details | Xeon E7320 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 66°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 0 |
Intel Xeon E7320 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 4570 vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$401 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 6500 vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 4460 vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 4690 vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||