Winner
Intel Core i7 4770
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E7320 vs Core i7 4770 |
Released September, 2007
Intel Xeon E7320
- 2.13 GHz
- Quad core
4.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7320
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
8.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
| | Much better performance per dollar 3.12 pt/$ | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E7320 vs 4770 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i7 4770CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 60% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.12 pt/$ | vs | 0.07 pt/$ | More than 41.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,029 | vs | 751 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.41 pt/W | vs | 1.14 pt/W | More than 9x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 9,523 | vs | 2,413 | Around 4x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2007 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.01 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 66 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E7320 vs Core i7 4770
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7320 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.14 pt/W | 10.41 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 68.25W | |
details | Xeon E7320 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 66°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
 Intel Xeon E7320  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4770 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $240 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $248 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $160 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i5 4570 vs i7 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $401 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i5 6500 vs i7 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $190 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs i7 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $280 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690 vs i7 4770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
