0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7220 vs Core i7 3770K |
Released September, 2007
Intel Xeon E7220
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7220
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 65W |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i7 3770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 3770K
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 16x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 114.97W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 42.19 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 112.39 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more threads | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Sep, 2007 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.4 °C | vs | 64 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7220 vs Core i7 3770K
clock speed
Xeon E7220
2.93 GHz
Core i7 3770K
3.5 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E7220
8 MB
Core i7 3770K
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon E7220
2.93 GHz
Core i7 3770K
4.69 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon E7220
2.93 GHz
Core i7 3770K
4.8 GHz
TDP
Xeon E7220
80W
Core i7 3770K
77W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7220 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 77W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 42.19 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 112.39 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 114.97W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon E7220 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 35 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.5V | 1.33 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.93 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.93 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 |
Intel Xeon E7220 ![]() | Intel Core i7 3770K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $128 | |
3770K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $240 | |
3770K vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $248 | |
3770K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $184 | |
3770K vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $350 | |
3770K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $330 | |
3770K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $520 | |
3770K vs X5650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||