Intel Xeon E7210 vs AMD A10 7400P |
Released September, 2007
Intel Xeon E7210
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7210
 | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core |
VS
Released May, 2014
AMD A10 7400P
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 7400P
| | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 102 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 4 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 65W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 102 °C | vs | 64 °C | Around 60% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | May, 2014 | vs | Sep, 2007 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E7210 vs A10 7400P
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7210 | vs | A10 7400P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 28.44W | |
details | Xeon E7210 | vs | A10 7400P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 28 nm | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 102°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ R6 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 576 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 654 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E7210  Report a correction |  AMD A10 7400P Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
