Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E7-8890 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v3

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
More threads 36 vs 4 32 more threads
More cores 18 vs 2 16 more cores; run more applications at once
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 4 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Itanium 2 9152

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 2 9152

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 84.5W vs 134.06W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year vs 144.54 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year vs 39.75 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E7-8890 v3  vs Itanium 2 9152 

clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E7-8890 v3  vs
Itanium 2 9152 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 4,800 MHz 667 MHz

details

Xeon E7-8890 v3  vs
Itanium 2 9152 
Threads 36 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 8 4

power consumption

TDP 165W 104W
Annual home energy cost 39.75 $/year 25.05 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 144.54 $/year 91.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 134.06W 84.5W
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v3
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 2 9152
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus