0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7-4830 vs Core i7 4860HQ |
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E7-4830
- 2.13 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7-4830
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 5.67 pt/$ | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 24 MB |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Core i7 4860HQ
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4860HQ
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 38.19W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 5.67 pt/$ | vs | 0.5 pt/$ | More than 11.2x better performance per dollar | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 24 MB | vs | 6 MB | 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports more RAM | 2,097,152 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 64x more RAM | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 6.75 pt/W | vs | 4.61 pt/W | More than 45% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 50% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 38.19W | vs | 85.31W | 2.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 3,183.5 | vs | 1,426 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 11,257 | vs | 10,443 | Around 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 41.17 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E7-4830 vs Core i7 4860HQ
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7-4830
10,443
Core i7 4860HQ
11,257
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7-4830
1,426
Core i7 4860HQ
3,183.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E7-4830
1,013,550 MB/s
Core i7 4860HQ
4,535 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4830 | vs | Core i7 4860HQ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 47W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 11.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 41.17 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.75 pt/W | 4.61 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 38.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E7-4830 | vs | Core i7 4860HQ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 200 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,097,152 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E7-4830 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4860HQ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $434 | |
Intel Core i7 6700HQ vs 4860HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $434 | |
Intel Core i7 4710HQ vs 4860HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $434 | |
Intel Core i7 4700HQ vs 4860HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $434 | |
Intel Core i7 4720HQ vs 4860HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$434 | $434 | |
Intel Core i7 4870HQ vs 4860HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $125 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs Xeon E7-4830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs Xeon E7-4830 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||