0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7-4820 vs E5-2650 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E7-4820
- 2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7-4820
![]() | Supports more RAM 2,097,152 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2650
- 2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2650
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | More l3 cache 20 MB |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W | ![]() | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 2,097,152 MB | vs | 393,216 MB | Supports more than 5.2x more RAM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 18 MB | More than 10% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 85.31W | Around 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2.25 MB/core | More than 10% more l3 cache per core | |||
Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date 11 months later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 10% lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4820 vs E5-2650
clock speed
Xeon E7-4820
2 GHz
Xeon E5-2650
2 GHz
turbo clock speed
Xeon E7-4820
2.27 GHz
Xeon E5-2650
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E7-4820
2 MB
Xeon E5-2650
2 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E7-4820
18 MB
Xeon E5-2650
20 MB
TDP
Xeon E7-4820
105W
Xeon E5-2650
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4820 | vs | E5-2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1567 | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 1 | 2 | |
Data rate | 23,464 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 5,860 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 2,930 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E7-4820 | vs | E5-2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 18 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.25 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 28 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 77.4°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,097,152 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon E7-4820 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | $1,126 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2650 v2 vs E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | $1,126 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,594 | $1,126 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 vs E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,126 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $1,126 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs Xeon E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | $1,126 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,126 | |
Intel Xeon X5650 vs E5-2650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||