0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2 vs Core i7 4770 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2
- 2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
![]() | More l3 cache 16 MB | ![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 68.25W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 8 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 48x more RAM | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Jun, 2013 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 70% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 55% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 85.31W | 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 68 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 20% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4820 v2 vs Core i7 4770
clock speed
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2 GHz
Core i7 4770
3.4 GHz
turbo clock speed
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2.5 GHz
Core i7 4770
3.9 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2 MB
Core i7 4770
1 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E7-4820 v2
16 MB
Core i7 4770
8 MB
TDP
Xeon E7-4820 v2
105W
Core i7 4770
84W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4820 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Xeon E7-4820 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 68°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 3 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $240 | |
4770 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $305 | |
4770 vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $248 | |
4770 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $160 | |
4770 vs 4570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
4770 vs 7800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $192 | |
4770 vs 4670K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $190 | |
4770 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||