Intel Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs E7-4809V4 |
VS
Released April, 2016
Intel E7-4809V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E7-4809V4
 | Supports more RAM 3,145,728 MB | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Newer Apr, 2016 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs the E7-4809V4. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Supports more RAM | 3,145,728 MB | vs | 1,572,864 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2016 | vs | Apr, 2015 | Release date a year later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs E7-4809V4
clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4809 v3 | vs | E7-4809V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 42,666.64 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 3,145,728 MB | |
details | Xeon E7-4809 v3 | vs | E7-4809V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 69°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 3 | 3 | |
| Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon E7-4809 v3  Report a correction |  Intel E7-4809V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,446 | ||
| E7-4820 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,360 | ||
| E5-2660 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,446 | $1,223 | |
| E7-4820 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $1,223 | |
| 6700K vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,223 | $1,223 | |
| E7-4809 v2 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $890 | $1,223 | |
| E7-4807 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $681 | $1,223 | |
| E5-2630 v3 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
