0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs E7-4809V4 |
VS
Released April, 2016
Intel E7-4809V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E7-4809V4
![]() | Supports more RAM 3,145,728 MB | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Newer Apr, 2016 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs the E7-4809V4. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 3,145,728 MB | vs | 1,572,864 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Apr, 2016 | vs | Apr, 2015 | Release date a year later |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs E7-4809V4
clock speed
Xeon E7-4809 v3
2 GHz
E7-4809V4
2.1 GHz
TDP
Xeon E7-4809 v3
115W
E7-4809V4
115W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4809 v3 | vs | E7-4809V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 42,666.64 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 3,145,728 MB |
details | Xeon E7-4809 v3 | vs | E7-4809V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 69°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 115W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
Number of links | 3 | 3 | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v3 ![]() | Intel E7-4809V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $1,223 | |
E5-2630 v3 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $1,223 | |
5200U vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,223 | $1,223 | |
E7-4809 v2 vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | $1,223 | |
5820K vs E7-4809 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
E7-4820V4 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,838 | ||
X7560 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,594 | ||
E5-2670 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||