Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2

Report a correction
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 393,216 MB Supports 4x more RAM
Lower typical power consumption 85.31W vs 105.63W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year vs 113.88 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year vs 31.32 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2680

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2680

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache 20 MB vs 12 MB More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C vs 68 °C 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1.5 MB Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More threads 16 vs 12 4 more threads
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core

Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4809 v2  vs E5-2680 

clock speed

Xeon E7-4809 v2
1.9 GHz
Xeon E5-2680
2.7 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E7-4809 v2  vs
E5-2680 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
LGA 2011

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 130W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 113.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 85.31W 105.63W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 3 2
Data rate 76,800 MB/s 64,000 MB/s
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 4,000 MHz

details

Xeon E7-4809 v2  vs
E5-2680 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 16
L2 cache 1.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 20 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 2
Clock multiplier 19 35
Operating temperature Unknown - 68°C Unknown - 85°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 34,133.32 MB/s 51,200 MB/s
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 393,216 MB
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-2680
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus