0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs E5-2680 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2
- 1.9 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2
![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 85.31W |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2680
- 2.7 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2680
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 20 MB |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 393,216 MB | Supports 4x more RAM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 85.31W | vs | 105.63W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 12 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 85 °C | vs | 68 °C | 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1.5 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core |
Features Key features of the Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs E5-2680
clock speed
Xeon E7-4809 v2
1.9 GHz
Xeon E5-2680
2.7 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E7-4809 v2
1.5 MB
Xeon E5-2680
2 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E7-4809 v2
12 MB
Xeon E5-2680
20 MB
TDP
Xeon E7-4809 v2
105W
Xeon E5-2680
130W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E7-4809 v2 | vs | E5-2680 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 3 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E7-4809 v2 | vs | E5-2680 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 19 | 35 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 68°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 34,133.32 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2680 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $1,594 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5-2670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $1,703 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5 2680 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | ||
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $1,155 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5 2650 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $2,086 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5-2690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $350 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,761 | $410 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs E5-2620 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||